Disclaimer: All words written are
exclusively mine, exercising my God Given right to express my opinion.
Statements here are factual, analytical and truthful, having a conscience void
of offence towards God and Man. The era of Political Correctness is over(Social Zombiism).
Few days
ago I posted 10 rhetorical questions on my Facebook page, those questions were
subtle and based on observations of comments of individuals to the ruling of
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of The United States), as expected there were outrages from “religious and conservative folks”, joy and celebration by
“liberals, LGBTQ
movement and atheists”, these jubilations
or cries were heard world over via social media, visual media, digital media
and the likes.
Prominent
people spoke out, POTUS Obama called it “a victory
for America”, Franklin Graham (son of the late popular televangelist Bill Graham) called for a boycott of
firms that are pro-gay. Bishop TD Jakes said the courts are of the world and
the church is the church and of Christ, FOX News fully supported the ruling,
however I’m not writing
to support or disregard the ruling, I’m writing to educate and enlighten people
on the social re-engineering and misinformation going on, aided by the Main
Stream Media (corporate sellouts), Hollywood, pop-culture and useful idiots.
About
five Decades earlier(1952 to be exact) homosexuality was
referred to as a mental disorder and included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), a reference book for America Psychiatrists
under the APA, in 1973 it was expunged from that manual and almost has no reference
in it to this day. The word “gay” doesn’t translate to homosexuals, it
ORIGINALLY MEANT “Jovial, happy, joyful, and good-spirited”, it was
redefined to fit the narrative of the homosexual lobby in 1992(for that
is when the word was first used to mean something else). In modern English the
word gay directly translates to homosexuals which is a combination of the Greek
(homo=same) and Latin (sexus=gender) words. With this information we can proceed to
unraveling the answer to my questions.
1) Do you know that
Marriage is NOT a RELIGIOUS institution?
Marriage
is not a religious instruction as the instruction is older than the oldest
religion (Paganism some would claim it is Hinduism). It was instituted by The Creator Jehovah Elohim God Almighty when
He first in His quintessential knowledge
created a woman from the ribs of a man to be a helpmeet for man. Provided you
are not one of those big bang theorists and evolutionary warriors, this little
information would make-do, a man was meant to leave his father and mother and cleave (stick closely, adhere
faithfully) to his wife till death do they part. For
what it’s worth, we need to understand and acknowledge the fact that
homosexuality is ‘almost’ as old as marriage (going by the Holy Bible), It’s
not new as some people would love to believe(Genesis 19:5 contained the first
hint of homosexuals).
2) Do you know that Marriage is NOT a CIVIL UNION?
2) Do you know that Marriage is NOT a CIVIL UNION?
There’s
often a misconception that marriage is a civil union, such rumors, thoughts or ideology
should be dispelled, again whenever marriage
took place in the early days, the input or approval of any sort of government
wasn’t required or demanded, the people involved in marriage were the family of
both parties and an officiating priest or minister as the situation would
require.
State licensure of marriage was initially done to prevent interracial marriages in early Slave America, it was later adopted for administrative purposes to provide some kind of support(child support and welfare) and benefits (tax billings, bank loans).
Marriage is older than government so why would marriage require
licensure from government? Government instead can recognize marriage but
shouldn’t interfere with it.
3) Do you know that less than 2% of the US population constitute GLBTQ?
3) Do you know that less than 2% of the US population constitute GLBTQ?
This
statement is FACTUAL, according to the NHIS (National Health Interview Survey),
the percentage of people who identify themselves as gay are no more than 1.6% of the total population, the survey was conducted in 2013, and so currently the numbers probably could be slightly higher but not exponentially.
GLBTQ translates to Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning (I
prefer the term Confused).
4) Do you realize that you(many) are
comfortable with lesbians but feel APPALLED by homosexuals?
As
earlier stated the original meaning of the term ‘gay’ was changed to fit into a
narrative, the homosexual lobby were losing the acceptance battle, they had to
rebrand. Change of the name from homosexuals to gay was the masterstroke needed
and it worked. Historically and statistically speaking homosexual men have more
health issues than lesbians, which would make it unappealing to many, however
it is a known fact that people generally accept lesbians until they start to
show their affection in public, then disgusts steps in, not to mention the
utter disdain when gay men do likewise. I call that hypocrisy, what is
acceptable of Paula should also be acceptable for Paul. The thoughts of anal is just too
gory in the ears of people I would presuppose.
5)
Do you know that most top executives in US Corporations are gays, even some
people in the Saudi Royal family are homosexuals too?
Well well, I was called up on this claim so
I have to rephrase my statement, saying most top executives are gay is too much
of an overgeneralization fallacy, yes there are homosexuals amongst them but most are not or should I put it thus(not
yet out of the closet). Tim Cook CEO of Apple Inc. is one of the few who are
out of the closet. As per the Arabs, it’s a closely guarded secret, but it
cannot be denied that certain members of that household are gays while they persecute those who dare
mention the word not to talk of practicing it.
6) Do you know that SCOTUS didn't create a new law?
6) Do you know that SCOTUS didn't create a new law?
Often misconstrued that SCOTUS created a
new law, instead
the judges created a RIGHTS(right to marry) from nothing, I laugh at the
thought-process of humanity even some who claim to be highly educated, a court
of law CANNOT create a new law.
Let
me break it down in simpler terms, in a democratic system of government, there
are 3 arms of government
a) Legislative: write laws,
edicts and formulate policies.
b) Executive: signs into law
the written edits, policies and laws by the legislative.
c) Judiciary: interprets
written and signed laws by reasons, studies and opinions.
Based on the brief insight, it won’t
require rocket science to see that courts and the judiciary can only interpret
existing laws, however the major problem lies in the ability of the judiciary
to interpret whatever suits them at a particular time and not the real reason
as to why the legislative penned it initially, basically what SCOTUS did was to
reinterpret an existing law to fit a narrative, by claiming that marriage is
about two persons not a man and a woman again and that it’s done to quell
loneliness! Seriously?? Good-news here is that the ruling was just the “OPINIONS” of 5 judges and NOT A LAW, bad-news however is
that it would be enforced and dissenters would be severely punished/persecuted.
A LAW doesn’t change that often, Opinions of the judges on the Supreme Court
does, in late 20th century the SCOTUS ruled sodomy a crime,
fast-forward to 2003 and 2015 sodomy is no longer a crime the LAW never changed
but the opinion of the judges did.
7) Do you know that "homophobes" is a wrong word to define those who don't approve of gay relationship?
7) Do you know that "homophobes" is a wrong word to define those who don't approve of gay relationship?
The word homophobe is derived from the term homophobia, again
the word homophobia ORIGINALLY meant fear of sameness or monotony, it is a
combination of the Greek words (homo=same and phobia=fear), as part of the
fitting a narrative and social re-engineering, the term was reinterpreted as
fear and or hatred for homosexuals
in 1989 by homosexual activists Marshall Kirk a neuropsychologist and Hunter
Madsen a Marketing expert in their book “After the Ball”.
Fear does not equate hate they are not synonymous, fear
of gays doesn’t mean one hate gays, you fear facing a judge on criminal charges
does that mean you hate the judge? Why should anyone be afraid of gays? Are
they going to rape, kill, steal or shoot anyone? No! So spare us the emotional
blackmail. A person can fear what they hate(e.g cats) but not necessarily
hating what they fear(e.g flying). The right word should be dislike for
homosexuals.
8)
Do you know that NOBODY WAS/IS BORN a homosexual or lesbian?
This is the scientific argument often
peddled around, newsflash!, no one is born a homosexual or lesbian,
as humans according to Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theories, little boys experience Oedipus complex while little girls experience Electra complex (Penis envy). Upon study of this psychoanalytic work one would confirm that an error at this stage of development could lead to many wrongs, homosexuality could even be an aftermath. This experience is necessary in unlocking and developing sexual identity and maturity.
Studies
have been conducted to prove the existence of a gay gene yet all have proved abortive, even the
studies (Dr. Simon LeVay works’ done in 1991) much sited by the gay
lobby proved that the “gay gene” never existed, infact if a gay gene existed it
could be well proved that a “bisexual-gene, rape-gene, pedophilia gene, polygamous-gene,
polyandry-gene, bestial-gene and transgender-gene” all existed.
9)
Do you know that GOD doesn't HATE gays?
I see uniformed Christians using The Bible as an attack tool, spewing crap and
misinforming people using what they think they know about what The Bible says
and not what actually it says.
Nowhere in the scriptures is it mentioned or even hinted that God ‘specially’
hated gays, the first hint of homosexuals was at Sodom and Gomorrah hence the
act of homosexuality called sodomy, those people and several others were
destroyed for their sins, if anyone reads the Bible carefully one would observe
that before a place/people was/were destroyed God always gave a reason (sin).
He is not willing that ANY should perish, however He's love and patience shouldn't
be taken for granted He mentions several times in His Word the end game for those
who engage in such profanity. Both heterosexual sinners and homosexual sinners
face the same wrath of God, remove the beam in your eyes before removing the
spec in another mans.
10) Do you know that GOD
ABHORS gay acts, AND HE'S willing to accept repentant folks?
As a Christian and a theist, the Bible remains
my number one constitution and moral code, I believe in it and use it as my
guide, in 2Peter 3:9b it reads thus “not
willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance”. His wish was and is plain and simple, 1Cor
6:9 clearly stated that abusers of themselves with mankind wouldn’t see God,
one cannot claim to be a Christian and be homosexual it just wouldn’t work,
just as a sinner cannot claim to be a Christian. Eight times was it mentioned that such
relationship is a sin, a warning cannot get scarier than that. Accept His ways
and live.
Wat
The Heck:
do you know that the gay-lobby doesn’t care about how gays feel? They are
pursuing an agenda and using useful idiots
like politically correct heterosexuals and ignorant well-intentioned homosexuals.
The ruling wasn’t about equality, it was about granting special rights to an
already over-privileged minority, actualization of agenda 21(population
control) and eventually culminating of a New World Order.
© 3025 Ahaiwe Ikenna Joshua – All rights Reserved
Comments
Post a Comment